Posterior Composites
Presented by Dr. Robert Margeas, DDS
Quiz Results and Correct Answers
1) When replacing the dentin with a self cure composite:
- the material is incrementally placed
- the self-cure composite can replace all of the missing tooth structure
- the material can be condensed as it is setting
- the self-cure material places the same stress on the bond as a light cured material
- must be used with a flowable liner
2) When restoring posterior teeth with light-cured composites:
- self-etching adhesives are the adhesives of choice
- filled adhesives make no clinical difference
- a radiolucent liner should be used
- an air-only dedicated line should be used for the bonding procedure
- a liner of 1-1.5 mm should be placed
3) Flowable composites as liners:
- do not affect the adaptation of composites to cavity walls
- reduce marginal leakage
- should be cured simultaneously with the adhesive
- have no effect on the flexural strength of composite resin restorations
- do not affect post-operative sensitivity
4) The shear bond strengths of self-etching adhesives to enamel:
- create a reliably strong bond
- have less microleakage than total-etch systems
- result in staining at the enamel-composite interface
- are not affected by the pH of the adhesive
- are all the same
5) When placing a packable, light cured posterior composite:
- the material should be placed in 2 mm increments
- the composite should be placed to below the contact area
- the top layer should be straight across bucco-lingually
- one can bulk fill the preparation
- a flowable liner has no effect
6) The self-etch adhesives have increased in popularity because:
- they have higher denting bonding strengths than the 4th generation adhesives
- they are universal with all composites
- the provide a hermetic seal for vital dentin
- the have lower incidence of post-operative sensitivity
- all have fewer steps than the fourth generation adhesives
7) Current composite resins:
- are all the same when it comes to polymerization contraction
- contract volumetrically 2% to 5%
- are all light cured
- react equally at the bonding interface with all adhesives
- have a system that shows the lowest polymerization contraction
8) C-factor of the cavity design:
- is the number of unbonded surfaces in the cavity design
- greatly affects the polymerization stress of the composite
- is highest in a class V cavity preparation
- is the lowest in an occlusal preparation
- has no effect on polymerization contraction stress
Click to go to the top of this page
